Trusted Tester ACT Implementation

Number of Rules Implemented
	Consistent	Partially consistent
WCAG 2 rules	6	1
Proposed rules	7	4

Implemented Rules

Rule Name	Type	Consistency
Menuitem has non-empty accessible name	WCAG 2 Rule	Consistent
HTML page has non-empty title	WCAG 2 Rule	Consistent
HTML page has lang attribute	WCAG 2 Rule	Consistent
HTML page title is descriptive	WCAG 2 Rule	Consistent
Image accessible name is descriptive	WCAG 2 Rule	Consistent
Element in sequential focus order has visible focus	WCAG 2 Rule	Consistent
HTML images contain no text	WCAG 2 Rule	Partial
Audio element content has text alternative	Proposed Rule	Consistent
Audio element content has transcript	Proposed Rule	Partial
Text content that changes automatically can be paused, stopped or hidden	Proposed Rule	Consistent
HTML element language subtag matches language	Proposed Rule	Consistent
Focusable element has no keyboard trap	Proposed Rule	Consistent
Focusable element has no keyboard trap via non-standard navigation	Proposed Rule	Partial
Focusable element has no keyboard trap via standard navigation	Proposed Rule	Partial
Form field label is descriptive	Proposed Rule	Consistent
Heading is descriptive	Proposed Rule	Consistent
Link in context is descriptive	Proposed Rule	Consistent
Video element auditory content has captions	Proposed Rule	Partial

About Trusted Tester Results

Results in this page are taken from a public test report published by US federal government. Data is published using the EARL+JSON-LD data format.

Implementation Details

Menuitem has non-empty accessible name

This rule is implemented by Trusted Tester using the update needed procedure. The implementation is fully consistent with the Menuitem has non-empty accessible name WCAG 2 rule. It covers all 8 examples. The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule. See understanding ACT consistency.

Success Criteria
Expected	Reported
4.1.2 Name, Role, Value	4.1.2 Name, Role, Value

Test Results
	update needed
Passed Example 1	passed
Passed Example 2	passed
Passed Example 3	passed
Passed Example 4	passed
Failed Example 1	failed
Failed Example 2	failed
Inapplicable Example 1	inapplicable
Inapplicable Example 2	inapplicable

HTML page has non-empty title

This rule is implemented by Trusted Tester using the 2.4.2-page-title-defined procedure. The implementation is fully consistent with the HTML page has non-empty title WCAG 2 rule. It covers all 11 examples. The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule. See understanding ACT consistency.

Success Criteria
Expected	Reported
2.4.2 Page Titled	2.4.2 Page Titled

Test Results
	2.4.2-page-title-defined
Passed Example 1	passed
Passed Example 2	passed
Passed Example 3	passed
Passed Example 4	passed
Passed Example 5	passed
Failed Example 1	failed
Failed Example 2	failed
Failed Example 3	failed
Failed Example 4	failed
Failed Example 5	failed
Inapplicable Example 1	inapplicable
Passed Example 2 *	untested
Failed Example 6 *	untested

*: These examples are not yet approved for the rule. Results on these outcomes are not taken into consideration determining the consistency and coverage.

HTML page has lang attribute

This rule is implemented by Trusted Tester using the 3.1.1-page-language-defined procedure. The implementation is fully consistent with the HTML page has lang attribute WCAG 2 rule. It covers all 7 examples. The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule. See understanding ACT consistency.

Success Criteria
Expected	Reported
3.1.1 Language of Page	3.1.1 Language of Page

Test Results
	3.1.1-page-language-defined
Passed Example 1	passed
Failed Example 1	failed
Failed Example 2	failed
Failed Example 3	failed
Failed Example 4	failed
Inapplicable Example 1	inapplicable
Inapplicable Example 2	inapplicable

HTML page title is descriptive

This rule is implemented by Trusted Tester using the 2.4.2-page-title-purpose procedure. The implementation is fully consistent with the HTML page title is descriptive WCAG 2 rule. It covers all 7 examples. The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule. See understanding ACT consistency.

Success Criteria
Expected	Reported
2.4.2 Page Titled	2.4.2 Page Titled

Test Results
	2.4.2-page-title-purpose
Passed Example 1	passed
Passed Example 2	passed
Passed Example 3	passed
Failed Example 1	failed
Failed Example 2	failed
Failed Example 3	failed
Inapplicable Example 1	inapplicable

Image accessible name is descriptive

This rule is implemented by Trusted Tester using the 1.1.1-meaningful-image-name procedure. The implementation is fully consistent with the Image accessible name is descriptive WCAG 2 rule. It covers all 16 examples. The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule. See understanding ACT consistency.

Success Criteria
Expected	Reported
1.1.1 Non-text Content	1.1.1 Non-text Content

Test Results
	1.1.1-meaningful-image-name
Passed Example 1	passed
Passed Example 2	passed
Passed Example 3	passed
Failed Example 1	failed
Failed Example 2	failed
Failed Example 3	failed
Inapplicable Example 1	inapplicable
Inapplicable Example 2	inapplicable
Inapplicable Example 3	inapplicable
Inapplicable Example 4	inapplicable
Inapplicable Example 5	inapplicable
Inapplicable Example 6	inapplicable
Inapplicable Example 7	inapplicable
Inapplicable Example 8	inapplicable
Inapplicable Example 9	inapplicable
Inapplicable Example 10	inapplicable

Element in sequential focus order has visible focus

This rule is implemented by Trusted Tester using the 2.4.7-focus-visible procedure. The implementation is fully consistent with the Element in sequential focus order has visible focus WCAG 2 rule. It covers all 7 examples. The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule. See understanding ACT consistency.

Success Criteria
Expected	Reported
2.4.7 Focus Visible	2.4.7 Focus Visible

Test Results
	2.4.7-focus-visible
Passed Example 1	passed
Passed Example 2	passed
Passed Example 3	passed
Passed Example 4	passed
Failed Example 1	failed
Inapplicable Example 1	inapplicable
Inapplicable Example 2	inapplicable
Passed Example 4 *	untested
Inapplicable Example 2 *	untested

*: These examples are not yet approved for the rule. Results on these outcomes are not taken into consideration determining the consistency and coverage.

HTML images contain no text

This rule is implemented by Trusted Tester using the 1.4.5-image-of-text procedure. The implementation is partially consistent with the HTML images contain no text WCAG 2 rule. It covers all 15 examples. The implementation reports different success criteria as failed from what is expected by this rule. See understanding ACT consistency.

Success Criteria
Expected	Reported
1.4.5 Images of Text 1.4.9 Images of Text (No Exception)	1.4.5 Images of Text

Test Results
	1.4.5-image-of-text
Passed Example 1	inapplicable
Passed Example 2	inapplicable
Passed Example 3	inapplicable
Passed Example 4	passed
Passed Example 5	passed
Passed Example 6	inapplicable
Passed Example 7	passed
Passed Example 8	passed
Failed Example 1	failed
Failed Example 2	failed
Failed Example 3	failed
Failed Example 4	failed
Failed Example 5	failed
Inapplicable Example 1	inapplicable
Inapplicable Example 2	inapplicable

Audio element content has text alternative

This rule is implemented by Trusted Tester using the 1.2.1-audio-transcript-text procedure. The implementation is fully consistent with the Audio element content has text alternative proposed rule. It covers all 8 examples. The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule. See understanding ACT consistency.

Success Criteria
Expected	Reported
1.2.1 Audio-only and Video-only (Prerecorded)	1.2.1 Audio-only and Video-only (Prerecorded)

Test Results
	1.2.1-audio-transcript-text
Passed Example 1	passed
Passed Example 2	passed
Passed Example 3	passed
Failed Example 1	failed
Failed Example 2	failed
Inapplicable Example 1	inapplicable
Inapplicable Example 2	inapplicable
Inapplicable Example 3	inapplicable

Audio element content has transcript

This rule is implemented by Trusted Tester using the 1.2.1-audio-transcript-text procedure. The implementation is partially consistent with the Audio element content has transcript proposed rule. It covers 10 of the 11 examples. The implementation reports different success criteria as failed from what is expected by this rule. See understanding ACT consistency.

Success Criteria
Expected	Reported
None	1.2.1 Audio-only and Video-only (Prerecorded)

Test Results
	1.2.1-audio-transcript-text
Passed Example 1	passed
Passed Example 2	passed
Passed Example 3	passed
Failed Example 1	failed
Failed Example 2	failed
Failed Example 3	failed
Failed Example 4	failed
Failed Example 5	failed
Failed Example 6	passed
Inapplicable Example 1	inapplicable
Inapplicable Example 2	inapplicable

Text content that changes automatically can be paused, stopped or hidden

This rule is implemented by Trusted Tester using the 2.2.2-auto-updating procedure. The implementation is fully consistent with the Text content that changes automatically can be paused, stopped or hidden proposed rule. It covers all 11 examples. The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule. See understanding ACT consistency.

Success Criteria
Expected	Reported
2.2.2 Pause, Stop, Hide	2.2.2 Pause, Stop, Hide

Test Results
	2.2.2-auto-updating
Passed Example 1	passed
Passed Example 2	passed
Passed Example 3	passed
Passed Example 4	passed
Passed Example 5	passed
Failed Example 1	failed
Inapplicable Example 1	inapplicable
Inapplicable Example 2	inapplicable
Inapplicable Example 3	inapplicable
Inapplicable Example 4	inapplicable
Inapplicable Example 5	inapplicable

HTML element language subtag matches language

This rule is implemented by Trusted Tester using the 3.1.2-part-language-defined procedure. The implementation is fully consistent with the HTML element language subtag matches language proposed rule. It covers all 14 examples. The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule. See understanding ACT consistency.

Success Criteria
Expected	Reported
3.1.2 Language of Parts	3.1.2 Language of Parts

Test Results
	3.1.2-part-language-defined
Passed Example 1	passed
Passed Example 2	passed
Passed Example 3	passed
Passed Example 4	passed
Passed Example 5	passed
Failed Example 1	failed
Failed Example 2	failed
Failed Example 3	failed
Failed Example 4	failed
Inapplicable Example 1	inapplicable
Inapplicable Example 2	inapplicable
Inapplicable Example 3	inapplicable
Inapplicable Example 4	inapplicable
Inapplicable Example 5	inapplicable

Focusable element has no keyboard trap

This rule is implemented by Trusted Tester using the 2.1.2-no-keyboard-trap procedure. The implementation is fully consistent with the Focusable element has no keyboard trap proposed rule. It covers all 16 examples. The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule. See understanding ACT consistency.

Success Criteria
Expected	Reported
2.1.2 No Keyboard Trap	2.1.2 No Keyboard Trap

Test Results
	2.1.2-no-keyboard-trap
Passed Example 1	passed
Passed Example 2	passed
Passed Example 3	passed
Passed Example 4	passed
Passed Example 5	passed
Passed Example 6	passed
Failed Example 1	failed
Failed Example 2	failed
Failed Example 3	failed
Failed Example 4	failed
Failed Example 5	failed
Failed Example 6	failed
Inapplicable Example 1	inapplicable
Inapplicable Example 2	inapplicable
Inapplicable Example 3	inapplicable
Inapplicable Example 4	inapplicable

Focusable element has no keyboard trap via non-standard navigation

This rule is implemented by Trusted Tester using the 2.1.2-no-keyboard-trap procedure. The implementation is partially consistent with the Focusable element has no keyboard trap via non-standard navigation proposed rule. It covers all 7 examples. The implementation reports different success criteria as failed from what is expected by this rule. See understanding ACT consistency.

Success Criteria
Expected	Reported
None	2.1.2 No Keyboard Trap

Test Results
	2.1.2-no-keyboard-trap
Passed Example 1	passed
Passed Example 2	passed
Passed Example 3	passed
Failed Example 1	failed
Failed Example 2	failed
Failed Example 3	failed
Inapplicable Example 1	passed

Focusable element has no keyboard trap via standard navigation

This rule is implemented by Trusted Tester using the 2.1.2-no-keyboard-trap procedure. The implementation is partially consistent with the Focusable element has no keyboard trap via standard navigation proposed rule. It covers 9 of the 11 examples. For 2 examples no results were reported. This can happen when examples are newer then the test results. The implementation reports different success criteria as failed from what is expected by this rule. See understanding ACT consistency.

Success Criteria
Expected	Reported
None	2.1.2 No Keyboard Trap

Test Results
	2.1.2-no-keyboard-trap
Passed Example 1	passed
Passed Example 2	untested
Passed Example 3	passed
Passed Example 4	untested
Failed Example 1	failed
Failed Example 2	failed
Failed Example 3	failed
Inapplicable Example 1	inapplicable
Inapplicable Example 2	inapplicable
Inapplicable Example 3	inapplicable
Inapplicable Example 4	inapplicable

Form field label is descriptive

This rule is implemented by Trusted Tester using the 2.4.6-label-descriptive procedure. The implementation is fully consistent with the Form field label is descriptive proposed rule. It covers all 14 examples. The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule. See understanding ACT consistency.

Success Criteria
Expected	Reported
2.4.6 Headings and Labels	2.4.6 Headings and Labels

Test Results
	2.4.6-label-descriptive
Passed Example 1	passed
Passed Example 2	passed
Passed Example 3	passed
Passed Example 4	passed
Passed Example 5	passed
Passed Example 6	passed
Failed Example 1	failed
Failed Example 2	failed
Failed Example 3	failed
Failed Example 4	failed
Failed Example 5	failed
Inapplicable Example 1	inapplicable
Inapplicable Example 2	passed
Inapplicable Example 3	inapplicable

Heading is descriptive

This rule is implemented by Trusted Tester using the 2.4.6-heading-purpose procedure. The implementation is fully consistent with the Heading is descriptive proposed rule. It covers all 14 examples. The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule. See understanding ACT consistency.

Success Criteria
Expected	Reported
2.4.6 Headings and Labels	2.4.6 Headings and Labels

Test Results
	2.4.6-heading-purpose
Passed Example 1	passed
Passed Example 2	passed
Passed Example 3	passed
Passed Example 4	passed
Passed Example 5	passed
Passed Example 6	passed
Failed Example 1	failed
Failed Example 2	failed
Failed Example 3	failed
Failed Example 4	failed
Inapplicable Example 1	inapplicable
Inapplicable Example 2	inapplicable
Inapplicable Example 3	inapplicable
Inapplicable Example 4	inapplicable

Link in context is descriptive

This rule is implemented by Trusted Tester using the 5effbb-test procedure. The implementation is fully consistent with the Link in context is descriptive proposed rule. It covers all 18 examples. The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule. See understanding ACT consistency.

Success Criteria
Expected	Reported
2.4.4 Link Purpose (In Context)	2.4.4 Link Purpose (In Context) 2.4.9 Link Purpose (Link Only)

Test Results
	5effbb-test
Passed Example 1	passed
Passed Example 2	passed
Passed Example 3	passed
Passed Example 4	passed
Passed Example 5	passed
Passed Example 6	passed
Passed Example 7	passed
Passed Example 8	passed
Passed Example 9	passed
Failed Example 1	failed
Failed Example 2	failed
Failed Example 3	failed
Failed Example 4	failed
Failed Example 5	failed
Failed Example 6	failed
Inapplicable Example 1	inapplicable
Inapplicable Example 2	inapplicable
Inapplicable Example 3	inapplicable

Video element auditory content has captions

This rule is implemented by Trusted Tester using the 1.2.2-captions-equivalent procedure. The implementation is partially consistent with the Video element auditory content has captions proposed rule. It covers all 8 examples. The implementation reports different success criteria as failed from what is expected by this rule. See understanding ACT consistency.

Success Criteria
Expected	Reported
None	1.2.2 Captions (Prerecorded)

Test Results
	1.2.2-captions-equivalent
Passed Example 1	passed
Passed Example 2	passed
Failed Example 1	failed
Failed Example 2	failed
Failed Example 3	failed
Failed Example 4	failed
Inapplicable Example 1	inapplicable
Inapplicable Example 2	inapplicable